chapotraphouse

13473 readers

1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

146

title (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 year ago by HarryLime@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

4-7 ejaculations per week is optimal in decreasing prostate cancer risk?

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I don't know about optimal, but it is superior (i.e. more optimal) to ejaculating less if your only metric is risk of prostate cancer.

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if your metric is being terminally cum brained?

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

then start with 40/week and see if you can still see straight afterward and go from there.

[–] lemmy_99c4zb3e3@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

ಠ_ಠ more optimal