this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
259 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

73655 readers
4378 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 95 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (21 children)

Instead, Musk is allegedly “all in on robotaxi,”

So instead of trying to compete with BYD, they are leaving that space open for Chinese domination, and instead they are trying to catch up to the Waymo-Uber-Lyft race where Tesla has not even tried to compete yet.

To me, it just seems that Musk just doesn't believe in market capitalism and competition. Or that he's exceptionally terrible at it.

[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 37 points 1 year ago (17 children)

I believe a huge chunk of Tesla's valuation is based on their automation tech, despite having very little real success towards full automation. So they have to focus on that and try to prove they can deliver.

But I'm guessing they won't succeed, as there are fundamental flaws with the technology itself, that can't be solved by throwing more sensors at the problem.

[–] Claidheamh@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But can it be solved by throwing less sensors at the problem? Cause that's what he's been doing. Removing sensors from the newer versions that were in the older ones.

[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Drop the cameras, add lidar instead. That's true 3d vision, which no amount of cameras can replace.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But people drive with just eyes, why can't cars drive with just eyes? Someone in Tesla accountint probably...

Elon has literally said exactly this so many times. I think it is probably possible to make a car drive with just vision, but you make the task monumentally harder by not having things that ground you in reality, ie. lidar.

[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Someone told them the problem was just "too many variables", so they figured by taking away sensors, there are fewer variables. Therefore, better self-driving.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)