this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
332 points (97.7% liked)

politics

25544 readers
2438 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You misunderstand, the legal battle isn't worth it until they win because the battle will be expensive as fuck and if they lose it never needed to have money spent on it.

Politics are a marathon not a sprint and a big part of that is knowing when to fight and lose money for a pyrrhic victory and when the ends don't justify the means.

[–] I_Clean_Here@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, money first, constitution and democracy second. How American of you.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one is saying that, I'm saying not every fight is worth the expense, some are some aren't she you need to have reserves for the ones that are.

[–] badbrainstorm@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most of these hillbillies probably barely have the money to campaign, let alone hire a defense team to make a case of it in court. Just say, nah, You're ineligible to run. And as if the courts don't have ridiculous, frivolous cases all the time anyway

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Indeed, so why spend money fighting a non issue when there are actual issues to spend on. Doesn't matter if its frivolous or not it will cost money to pursue.

[–] badbrainstorm@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To uphold the constitution!?

These courts no concerns ever burning taxpayer dollars on much less pressing issues all the time!

I guarantee that if they don't stand up now, it has nothing to do with legal cost. It has absolutely everything to do with fear of backlash from ludicrous dipshits, and having to have the spine to tell them to fucking deal with it

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

You can do that without throwing money into bottomless holes.

And your solution is that its a waste but they're already doing it so waste more time and money? Not reform but instead keep doing it but just do it the way you'd like.

That's also an issue yes, but again throwing away time and money on a non issue only to get death threats from fuckwits is not at all worth it. Spend your time and money on it boss, no one is stopping you and to borrow a few words "I guarantee that if ~~they~~ you don't stand up now, it has nothing to do with legal cost."