Interesting Shares

2638 readers

72 users here now

Fascinating articles, captivating images, satisfying videos, interesting projects, stunning research and more.

Share something you find incredibly interesting.

Prefix must be included in the title!

Mandatory prefixes for posts

It helps to see at glance what post is about and certain clients also offer filters that make prefixes searchable/filterable.

Note: Photon (m.lemmy.zip) frontend used for links above.

Icon attribution

If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

BrikoX@lemmy.zip

Demographics Professor Warns that by 2531, Everyone in Japan Will be Named Sato (www.spoon-tamago.com)

submitted 2 years ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/interestingshare@lemmy.zip

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Despite today's date, this is not an April Fool's prank. At a press conference in Tokyo last weekend, professor Hiroshi Yoshida from the Tohoku University Research Center for Aged Economy and Society, sounded the alarm bell for a looming crisis. By the year 2531, e

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Will the whole world be Wang after x million years?

No, because the paper is nonsense and the scientist is probably releasing it for political reasons. Wives being forced to take their husband's surnames do not directly contribute to a single surname taking over, since there's a proportionally equal chance that they're moving away from the Sato surname. The main issue that affects the odds is how many male kids the non-Satos have as well as societal pressures (like this one).

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The math is also wrong.

You can't apply exponential growth to the proportion of a total.

Growing from 1% to 2% (a 100% gain) is equally a reduction from 99% to 98%, a 1.01% drop.
Going from 99% to 100% (a 1.01% gain) is equally a reduction from 1% to 0%, an infinite drop.

Simple exponential modeling is the wrong tool.

[–] urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago

Oh… he’s just doing an exponential growth model?? I have trouble understanding how this got traction at all then, he should be embarrassed. Maybe the delivery was tongue-in-cheek?

I assumed there was more interesting happening in that paper. How disappointing.

I assumed there was more behind that graph (I assumed he calculated the coefficient from something more interesting and just slapped it on a graph with like y = exp(\beta_0 x) for his news article)