this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10312 readers
863 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Miller said some of those students come to Canada with the hope of a safe future and a successful career.

Who tells them this? I doubt it’s everyday Canadians.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Global Affairs advertises directly to students (spending around $30 million annually). That's in conjunction with provinces and institutions.

Additionally, immigration consultants are officially allowed by a couple of provinces (BC, and one other IIRC). They sometimes receive commissions.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it's in the marketing material sent abroad to recruit students for the benefit of post-secondary institutions that use them to plug gaps in funding. It's been reported on for a long time how they're exploited.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So they come here due to corporate lies? Yeah I can see that

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you're referring to universities as corporate, then yeah more or less. It's a con game. When issues like this persist and worsen for a long time (I first heard about a more benign form of this issue a good 20 years ago), it's safe to assume that's because powerful people want it that way. Public anger is useful as long as it's directed at responsible parties who get real benefits, not victims of a con. This is the result of corporate and public governance based on numbers and not people.