400
Crystal Mason: Texas woman sentenced to five years over voting error acquitted
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
400 points (99.3% liked)
News
36889 readers
3742 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hence my emphasis on "relatively". That would be $25K in Michigan, and $0 in most states.
So technically, it is bigger in Texas.
That is simply false.
https://www.mlive.com/news/jackson/2024/01/michigan-man-awarded-17m-from-state-after-spending-36-years-in-prison-for-crime-he-didnt-commit.html
The law is described incorrectly. They wrote (my emphasis):
But when you click on the link you find:
So by Michigan law he was entitled to $50K/yr, which is less than provided by Texas law ($80K/yr + other benefits).
And of course $50K/yr over 36 years is roughly the $1.75 million he received. If it were actually per day, he would have gotten over $600 million.
Originally you said:
So which is it?
She was incarcerated for a few months, not an entire year. The $80K/yr is prorated, so most likely she can get something under $40K.
You certainly didn't make that clear. And even for a few months of wrongful incarceration (along with the years of having to spend time in court), $40,000 is pitiful. Absolutely pitiful.
"They don't pay as much in other states" doesn't make it any less pitiful.
Would you find that to be adequate compensation for destroying five years of your life for doing something that wasn't illegal?
Man, you just want to argue with anyone you can about anything you can, huh?
You're being unreasonable, replying to their observing that despite this being awful, they're somehow better than a bunch of other states.
I'm agreeing with them?
You certainly didn't make that clear.
Or true.
I never said it was adequate.
I replied to the suggestions that it doesn't matter because she already served her time (it actually does matter), that she should sue (she can but recovery is limited), and that everything is bigger in Texas (yes it is, relatively speaking).
Note that courts never compensate innocent people who are tied up in court, even for years. Compensation is only for people who are wrongfully incarcerated. Even in Texas.