this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
73 points (100.0% liked)

art

22235 readers
22 users here now

A community for sharing and discussing art, aesthetics, and music relating to '80s, '90s, and '00s retro microgenres and also art in general now!

Some cool genres and aesthetics include:

If you are unsure if a piece of media is on theme for this community, you can make a post asking if it fits. Discussion posts are encouraged, and particularly interesting topics will get pinned periodically.

No links to a store page or advertising. Links to bandcamps, soundclouds, playlists, etc are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
73
they did the joke (hexbear.net)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by happybadger@hexbear.net to c/art@hexbear.net
 

https://www.reddit.com/r/modernart/comments/1bpaiae/shoot_um_moma_what_is_this/

Rothko's Untitled. I don't like abstract expressionism but he's probably the technical height of it from how much work actually went into that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don’t hear the end about the classical painters because that’s what society has declared to be Good Art.

What you think is "society" was actually art traders and rich people from hundreds of years ago, as opposed to less than a hundred years ago. Doesn't mean that the works and the artists should be dismissed because of the material conditions of the time, but rather taken into account when appreciating said art.

[–] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

The person im replying to suggests the need to “push back” against a supposed “movement” or mass defense of abstract art. I’m not trashing on traditional art, just saying that it “pushing back” against abstract art is entirely pointless because society doesn’t care about it enough for it be meaningful in any way.