this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
73 points (100.0% liked)

art

22235 readers
22 users here now

A community for sharing and discussing art, aesthetics, and music relating to '80s, '90s, and '00s retro microgenres and also art in general now!

Some cool genres and aesthetics include:

If you are unsure if a piece of media is on theme for this community, you can make a post asking if it fits. Discussion posts are encouraged, and particularly interesting topics will get pinned periodically.

No links to a store page or advertising. Links to bandcamps, soundclouds, playlists, etc are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
73
they did the joke (hexbear.net)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by happybadger@hexbear.net to c/art@hexbear.net
 

https://www.reddit.com/r/modernart/comments/1bpaiae/shoot_um_moma_what_is_this/

Rothko's Untitled. I don't like abstract expressionism but he's probably the technical height of it from how much work actually went into that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (25 children)

fuck the cia fuck all their artists and fuck defending this garbage.

For decades in art circles it was either a rumour or a joke, but now it is confirmed as a fact. The Central Intelligence Agency used American modern art - including the works of such artists as Jackson Pollock, Robert Motherwell, Willem de Kooning and Mark Rothko - as a weapon in the Cold War. In the manner of a Renaissance prince - except that it acted secretly - the CIA fostered and promoted American Abstract Expressionist painting around the world for more than 20 years.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html

[–] christian@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The incident like twenty years ago where someone discovered a "lost" Pollock painting and there were heated arguments between historians over whether it was a fake was so funny to me. I don't have any background in art history myself so take this with a grain of salt, but when I looked at it I saw a bunch of paint splotches, which leads me to believe it was authentic.

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah i have no idea how you could "verify" an unprovenanced pollock

[–] TheDoctor@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

You can do analysis of the materials and the techniques and try to pinpoint it on the timeline or his career. From what I gather, it’s a subjective practice which uses objective instruments.

load more comments (22 replies)