Asklemmy

43810 readers

1 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

118

What is your favorite paradox or conundrum? I am partial to can god kill god? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Daft_ish@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

291 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The monotheistic all powerful one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Timwi@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Newcomb’s paradox is my favourite. You have two boxes in front of you. Box B contains $1000. You can either pick box A only, or both boxes A and B. Sounds simple, right? No matter what's in box A, picking both will always net you $1000 more, so why would anyone pick only box A?

The twist is that there's a predictor in play. If the predictor predicted that you would pick only box A, it will have put $1,000,000 in box A. If it predicted that you would pick both, it will have left box A empty. You don't know how the predictor works, but you know that so far it has been 100% accurate with everyone else who took the test before you.

What do you pick?

[–] esc27@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I pick box A, then later pay the predictor his cut, which will work because he would have predicted I would do so.

[–] Timwi@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I do not believe that the premise includes the stipulation that the predictor is human.

[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's what I've read so far. I mean, I've never heard of the predictor being human. Usually it's described as a super computer or some other "being". I e. No one that cares about your feelings or about being compensated 😂

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Robots need money too

load more comments (6 replies)