this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
196 points (99.5% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15897 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Perfect no notes mama-miba

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] disposable_cracker@hexbear.net 62 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If they weren’t such weasels and actually agrued back rather than just ban people like the spineless dimwit twats they are, I’d say the argument that they are easily filtered holds. But given they are just looking to propagate their shilling for Russia, trump (and they definitely do this) etc… fuck em!

[–] axont@hexbear.net 74 points 1 year ago

Whenever I've seen a person say they got banned from hexbear unfairly I check the modlog and they were repeatedly saying something racist or transphobic. It's every single time lmao

[–] sovietknuckles@hexbear.net 59 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I asked for an example of Hexbear defending Trump but they owned me with downvotes

no example

[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When Democrats blatantly work with Republicans, or roll over when the Republicans push even slightly: It's fine, that's just politics

When a fringe internet forum isn't as critical of the Orange Man as liberal media is, and also criticizes Biden: They're secretly right wing Trump supporters

[–] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When Joe Biden stands up in front of a joint session of congress for his inaugural state of the union address and declares we need to fund the police, then diverts Covid funding to the police in the middle of a pandemic which cost over a million lives, that isn't authoritarianism. When communists say genocidaires deserve to be minced like an onion, THAT is authoritarianism.

[–] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've openly argued for the decapitation of trump, I will not take this slander

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

wow so lenient

you must love him

[–] disposable_cracker@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

and they definitely do this

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 54 points 1 year ago

Imagine debating with the peasants instead of just flinging them in to the moat iwth a catapult while taking big sloppy bites out of your giant leg of something and spilling ale from your gem encrusted chalice.

[–] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

and that is why we should ban them, and anyone who allows them on their platform

[–] Doubledee@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I can't tell if this is just projection or if we really come across this way. I know some users get mad and have some snarky repartee and our emoji game is legendary, but I feel like every time I remember these libs showing up they were given real arguments when asked. I dunno if there's any point to caring and trying harder, maybe agony arguing at all is too much for these guys. It just makes me nervous.

[–] Meh@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

It's just the snarky reddit-logo users getting mad because they never tried to engage in good faith and rightly got pigpoopballsed.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

Nah, it's very much them editorializing to leave out the parts where they were invariably explained the error of their thinking and then proceeded to double and triple down. Our loveable and indispensable nerds love explaining historical and theoretical things to people

[–] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They dismiss the real arguments because we also call them a fucking idiot in the same comment and they believe that makes it an ad hominem attack.

Edit: This is not meant to suggest that I will or we should stop calling them fucking idiots. They are fucking idiots, and such fucking idiots they don't even know how ad hominem arguments work.