this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
12 points (92.9% liked)

chat

8151 readers
2 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I saw a NYT article today that just felt the need to link to this image of the DPRK as a means of pointing out the failings of socialist states (in a totally unrelated article, not surprising). I know that they're not providing the context both current and historical for why there is this disparity between the two Koreas, but I lack the knowledge or resources to effectively combat this blatant propaganda.

I know this photo has been around for a while, and I figured there might already be some myth-busting written somewhere I'm not aware of.

The obvious implication from this photo is:

socialism-is-when speech-side-l-1 "Socialism is when No Electricity". speech-side-l-2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

all the light shooting off into space is waste, so when you're not lighting up a fuckload of billboards and you design your street lights efficiently there won't be so much light pollution.

there's a bunch of rural poverty of course but it's dishonest to talk about that without talking about the trade embargo

[–] edge@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

all the light shooting off into space is waste, so when you're not lighting up a fuckload of billboards and you design your street lights efficiently there won't be so much light pollution.

Yes, but it's not like the DPRK has figured out some amazing solution to block most light pollution that no other country, not even China, has access to.

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

not having billboards lit up all night is probably worth a lot. I'd imagine they also don't keep the lights on in office towers either.

it certainly doesn't explain all of it but idk we don't really have pictures like this of anywhere else from, say, the 1950s