Linguistics Humor

1500 readers

3 users here now

Do you like languages and linguistics ? Here is for having fun about it

For serious linguistics content: !linguistics@mander.xyz

Rules:

1- Stay on Topic
Post about linguistics or language humor & memes
2- No Racism/Violence
3- No Public Shaming No shaming someone that could be identifiable or recognizable
4- Avoid spam and duplicates

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Jakylla@sh.itjust.works

lvxferre@mander.xyz

The descriptivist's dilemma (infosec.pub)

submitted 2 years ago by pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de to c/linguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

spoiler

alt text: A two panel comic. In the first panel there are two buttons labeled "I don't believe in prescriptivism" and "'Literally' cannot mean 'figuratively'". A finger hovers between the buttons. In the second panel, the finger's owner is sweating and wiping his brow, unable to decide.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Shalakushka@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Literally can mean figuratively if you hate being clear, but it's a much easier world to live in if words don't mean two precisely fucking opposite things.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Plenty of words mean two precisely opposite things. Cleave, clip, dust, sanction, argue, drop, and a bunch of other examples that I'm shamelessly copying from a website

Language doesn't work properly without context anyway. Saying "I literally died" has one obvious meaning when I'm talking about a meme someone posted on discord, and a different obvious meaning when I'm talking to the news about the time my heart stopped beating.

[–] Shalakushka@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You aren't interacting with the premise of my argument. I'm not saying this hasn't happened before. I'm saying is it useful to add another one that has no actual use beyond "I cannot think of an adverb"?

[–] cazssiew@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The premise of your argument is 'why aren't people more rational?'. That's a silly premise.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago

No one ever seems to have a problem with really (as in real) or very (from verily, ie true) being used in figurative senses, however.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, actual usefulness is where I draw the line for descriptivism, I guess.