this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
143 points (92.8% liked)

politics

25197 readers
2743 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Of course it is, Bidens whole shtick is looking like he’s going to do something without committing in any meaningful way.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Second question.

Is that face AI generated? He looks like a Heel about lay the smack down in some WWE baby face.

That, or a plastic mannequin.

Edit: for reference:

[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And here we have attacks on the president's appearance? How very progressive of you: saving Gazan lives, one demented post at a time.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you think if I went through your comment history I'd find you making fun of trumps appearance?

[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Go for it, I'm another imperfect human being, but I certainly don't hide my post history.

Quick edit to highlight the pattern hereabouts: brash assumptions in lieu of easily accessible information. Such a lazy purity test.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah I'm lazy and don't care, it was a bluff. Carry on

[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nah I'm lazy and don't care, it was a bluff. Carry on

Precisely, and I invite others to check your post history as a result. Such dishonesty through multiple conversations.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Sorry? Dishonesty?

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

They photoshopped him to look less like a sleepy skeleton.

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's going to be such a fantastic 4 years with Donnie after watching D's tear themselves apart ignoring Biden being great and just being completely unrealistic and unreasonable with reality.

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

. . . So you think not enabling genocide is unrealistic and unreasonable with reality?

The bar here is pretty low, stop sending Israel weapons and money, stop defending them in the UN, and stop saying you support them.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You don't prevent genocide by letting the guy who can't be convinced anything is a bad idea win instead of the guy who can.

If both options were reasonable then ok, let the other guy win as a matter of principle, but right now the alternative is way worse and won't help with your cause either.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You don't win votes by convincing people the other guy's worse. Full stop.

Stop celebrating Democrats making TERRIBLE political moves by failing to condemn terrible political moves...

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

convincing people the other guy’s worse.

At its heart, voting is choosing the least-worse option.

Our best case is being able to repeat this until the criminally-bad options are gone and we only have good options to choose from, but while life expectancy and objective happiness is far, far below what it should be for such a rich nation, you know we have some heavy evolution ahead.

[–] dvoraqs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Voting in a First Past the Post election system is like this. If we can switch to another system like the Single Transferrable Vote, we can get better results.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Don’t be stupid. Trump is going to demand they nuke and pave Palestine and he’ll open a string of Trump resorts for free as his reward. Think that’s unlikely? Please. We’ve got a ton of receipts. He’s 1000 times worse than a Biden administration. So cut the GRU bullshit.

If “Young Progressive Activists” were actually serious about stopping a millenia-old conflict on the other side of the world, the point of entry is their representative and senator. Do they even know who that is? Representatives pass legislation to require (cease-fire, aid, reparations, whatever) or no more money. That’s what they say they actually want.

Magical Santa President is a child’s cartoon. And the conversation of this constant BiDeN gEnOcIdE train is a sad hEr EmAiLs argument in design and purpose.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And you don't improve things by letting the worst option take power by your inaction.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No one has said they wouldn't vote against Trump. Why do you assume every vote has to be FOR Biden?

Not every vote has to come with an ass kissing, you sycophantic dipshits.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

When did the USA adopt a system where voting independent or third party when you lean left has any influence and prevents the Republicans from taking power? Unless you were planning to vote Republican and will vote for someone else?

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is it so confusing to understand that someone can still vote for Biden while not wanting to vote for Biden?

You're all literally too simple to understand how personal morals work, apparently. Sad.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, it's your phrase that didn't make sense as you said not voting for Trump while also not voting for Biden, learn to express yourself clearly and then start sharing your opinion.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Again, reading comprehension of a 5 year old.

If at least you were humble enough to not be an ass...

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No one has said they wouldn't vote _against_ Trump. Why do you assume every vote has to be FOR Biden?

Yeah so in written form that's exactly what you said, if you wanted to convey that you would vote for Biden without supporting his politics then that's what you should have said or instead of using all caps on FOR you should have used quotation marks around it.

Pretty funny you're the one who started throwing insults by I'm the ass here

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Okay so if this guy can be confined genocide is a bad idea, when exactly is that going to happen?

I didn’t think it was so challenging, but I guess Biden really struggles with this choice?

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think preventing this country from turning into a dictatorship that is planning to commit genocide on LGBTQs and women her is a low bar?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think supporting genocide is acceptable as long as it's brown people in another country?

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think destroying this country, eliminates any possibility of stopping genocide anywhere else. But you seem intent on supporting genocide everywhere...

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Imagine being this indoctrinated into American exceptionalism.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, that's the entire Democrats' MO, but we cannot speak ill of Democrats while Trump exists, don't you know!

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

we cannot speak ill of Democrats while Trump exists, don’t you know!

Sure we can. The idea of loyalty over all is actually a foundation of conservative political parties, while center- and left-leaning parties are increasingly critical of themselves. It's why charity or protest groups splinter all the time or just implode with all that angst.

It's okay if you don't know that. It's part-and-parcel.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Dems are self-critical? You should try telling that to the DNC.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whataboutism about whataboutism. Wowee.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, you see, you're doing it, too. I didn't just say "what about". I said it's their entire MO. Yet all you fucking morons do is see that I said something negative about the less bad party.

Congratulations, you're still engaging in team sports.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Congratulations, you have the brain of a child and no valid point to make. Sad.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

"lazy insults with no substance"

🥱