this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
707 points (98.2% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
8176 readers
544 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Me too! I didn't even say the usual Latin word isn't cepa, in fact one of my sources says that in plain terms. Maybe improve your English reading comprehension since you're so proud of your polyglotism.
I understand doubting etymonline.com but the OED and Collins Dictionaries are authoritative sources written by lexicographers. You know, people who dedicate their working lives to the meanings and origins of words. Wind your neck in, you arrogant milksop.
I think you're confusing the reputation of the average anglophone as monolingual with the quite storied reputation of English lexicographers. Your mouth is much bigger than what's behind it.
So if I open ten English dictionaries and they all agree that "onion" comes from the Latin "unionem" via the Old French "oignon", will you promise to stop dying on this hill? Given that I've already shown you three that agree on that very thing? How confident are you feeling? Actually now that I think, you said you'd looked it up but you've nothing yet to show for it, so what's your source?