history

23025 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

WhoaSlowDownMaurice@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

What's the deal with Stalin? (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 years ago by RedWizard@hexbear.net to c/history@hexbear.net

103 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In my continued exposure to leftist spaces and a leftist view on history it has become clear that all I understand about Stalin is the reactionary rhetoric I've been fed my whole life. I have only just started on reading theory and exposing myself to a leftist view, so Stalin as a topic isn't something I've reached yet.

But I have to ask, and I think this is the place to ask it, what is the deal with Stalin?

The vibe I get is that people at a minimum don't hate Stalin, but also maybe at most appricate Stalin. I'm aware that the efforts of the USSR during WW2, especially in regards to Nazi aggression are a credit to his administration and leadership, but is that really where the vibe starts and stops?

I'm not looking for a dissertation on the guy, but just the notes or primary points. I'll take reading suggestions too.

Thanks comrades.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AcidMarxist@hexbear.net 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

He was a complicated guy. Grew up with an abusive father and a mother who left his dad and basically raised Stalin by herself. He got into a lot of fights in school, got disabled when a carriage almost ran him over, studied to be a priest as seminary, which is when he stumbled across Marxist theory. I think he really believed in what he fought for, but was such a hothead in his youth that he was even mistaken for an agent provocateur of the Tsarist secret police.

But he put his life on the line to become a revolutionary and in the end climbed to the top of Lenin's cadre. The guy was a gangster, but in maybe the best way possible. He sacrificed a lot of people for a greater cause and ultimately saved the Soviet Union from destruction by significantly worse men.

At the same time, he wasnt a nice dude. If you look into his personal life there are a lot of nasty things. I mean the guy used Beria as a tool to ensure he wouldnt lose power. Had bad personal relationships with his friends and family.

But unlike the shittiest men you've probably known irl, he actually did a lot of good for the cause. We can hem and haw over who SHOULD have held power in the USSR and global communist movement, but at the end of the day he wasthe guy. Tbh his biggest fuck up was stopping at Berlin.

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

and a mother who left his dad and basically raised Stalin by herself.

this would be incredibly funny to tell the hogs about.

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Later in life he asked his mom why she beat him so bad as a kid and she told him so that he would become the good man that he was.

I like telling people that bit if they think smacking kids is okay. Because they're usually reactionary fucks that think Stalin was the devil incarnate.

[–] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago

I’m not sure what that would achieve. They already believe that single mothers are the source of 85% of the evil and hedonism in this world.

load more comments (2 replies)