this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
32 points (94.4% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15897 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
32
Note: I AM GREEN. (hexbear.net)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Angel@hexbear.net to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net
 

The fact that they literally think that me critiquing their language got them to question if I were either a "transphobe or ally" is very questionable. I'm literally a transfeminine (AMAB) enby myself. Nothing of what I said was trans exclusionary. The statement "Some AFABs are men" is literally very trans inclusive. Separating AFABs and men as two mutually exclusive groups, however, isn't trans inclusive. It's clearly a pretentious and performative attempt at inclusion because that's functionally no different than typical TERF-drivel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Pisha@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lmao This is exactly why the word "theyfab" was coined. To be precise: Simultaneously claiming that femaleness is based on birth assignment, which is just basic transphobia, and also professing a nonbinary identity without any attempt to reconcile this contradiction is a kind of egoism born out of a half-hearted understanding of transfeminism. And of course it always ends in transmisogyny, because if all AFABs get a "happy woman's day", what gender is left for the rest of us?

[โ€“] Angel@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As an AMAB enby, this is a glimpse into me finally understanding why some binary trans people, especially trans women, have developed enbyphobic views. Not that I'm justifying their enbyphobia, but I've always been a pretty outspoken opponent of enbyphobia, especially in the context of infighting within the trans community specifically. I always thought this whole thing about "AFAB enbies sometimes seeming just like TERFy cis women" was a myth until I experienced this. However, that being said, I know this is a loud minority. There are tons of AFAB enbies themselves who would object to this bullshit, and at the end of the day, regardless if you're cis or trans, binary or non-binary, just keep the problematic, divisive language out of fighting our battles against oppression. That shit helps no one.