this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
32 points (94.4% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15897 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
32
Note: I AM GREEN. (hexbear.net)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Angel@hexbear.net to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net
 

The fact that they literally think that me critiquing their language got them to question if I were either a "transphobe or ally" is very questionable. I'm literally a transfeminine (AMAB) enby myself. Nothing of what I said was trans exclusionary. The statement "Some AFABs are men" is literally very trans inclusive. Separating AFABs and men as two mutually exclusive groups, however, isn't trans inclusive. It's clearly a pretentious and performative attempt at inclusion because that's functionally no different than typical TERF-drivel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] YearOfTheCommieDesktop@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I heard someone say recently that the only major, sticky divide in the trans community is basically this. People who do this weird shit where they reinvent the wheel of discrimination and bioessentialize based on AGAB vs the "it's all socially constructed?" astronaut-1 people.

I'm bad at explaining it but you know what I mean. The bioessentialist types are firmly in the "I want nothing to do with you" camp in my book. Honestly except in the limited circumstances where it makes a practical difference, any reference to AGAB is sus to me. Don't make that your identity, why are you even trans if you're gonna just identify with your agab all the time anyhow?

[โ€“] Angel@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Even then, you don't need AGAB to explain a lot of the things people are asking, but you can derive it from the language otherwise.

Examples:

  • I'm non-binary, and I just started estrogen! I'm so excited! (Likely AMAB)
  • I'm non-binary, and I want to cut my hair to look more masculine. It'll really help with my dysphoria. (Likely AFAB)
  • I'm non-binary, and I like how deep my voice has been getting since starting HRT. (Likely AFAB)

People who go out of their way to characterize AGAB as making you a "certain kind of enby" or just a weird spin on cis (or, in some cases, even trans) people of your assigned sex give me an awful headache.