this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
61 points (98.4% liked)

history

23025 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

it's probably reductionist or lazy or whatever, but i have become somewhat hung up on the case that, with limited exception, human activities that break the cycle of biodegredation are the basis for our understanding of the sophistication of earlier cultures. even this giant pile of bones or evidence of the Pleistocene overkill. that very lengthy period before killing shitloads of animals in one place, moving giant fucking rocks really far from where they formed, and the fabrication of materials that do not return to the earth within a hundred years is hidden from inquiry and the subject of speculation. "these primitives, they didn't even quarry stone and build giant tombs!" it's easy to dismiss the era as unworthy of inquiry.

meanwhile, the bleeding, intellectual edge of engineering and technology today is so-called "green chemistry", which has general principles of zero waste and a circular/regenerative life cycle. because apparently, a mountain of single-use plastic and styrofoam garbage was not as inspired as it seemed to be.