this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
850 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

74003 readers
2987 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google have their own data centres (and cloud) so it may be something more in the connectivity area.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Maybe, I would expect redundancy. But ultimately I have no clue. I just remember the last time AWS went down. It seemed that a majority of the sites that I used daily were down all in one go.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sometimes redundancy doesn't help when it comes to network traffic routing. That system is based heavily on trust and an incorrect route being published can cause recursive loops and such that get propagated very quickly to everyone.

There was a case like this a few years back where a bad route got published by a small ISP, claiming they could handle traffic to a certain set of destinations, but then immediately trying to send that traffic back out again (because they couldn't actually route to that destination), which bounced right back to them because of the bad route. It was propagated based on implicit trust and took down huge chunks of the Internet for a while

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So could this be done maliciously? I'm just wondering about the Super Tuesday timing.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, BGP Route Hijacking can be done maliciously although things like BGPSec can make it harder to pull off.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're talking about Border Gateway Protocol, BGP, route hijacking and it's occasionally been a real headache over the years. Advertising routes used to be a more manual process so typos and incorrect entries, like what you're talking about, we're reasonably common. It was, and still can be, done maliciously too.

https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/tip/How-does-BGP-hijacking-work-and-what-are-the-risks

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yup! BGP is an absolute mess and it is kind of a disgrace that it's still the lynchpin of the internet

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, they definitely host an unhealthy amount of the internet.