this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
203 points (90.4% liked)

Technology

76640 readers
2634 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
203
It’s No Surprise That “Skills-Based” Hiring Has Not Worked (www.forbes.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by redfox to c/technology@lemmy.world
129 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This article outlines an opinion that organizations either tried skills based hiring and reverted to degree required hiring because it was warranted, or they didn't adapt their process in spite of executive vision.

Since this article is non industry specific, what are your observations or opinions of the technology sector? What about the general business sector?

Should first world employees of businesses be required to obtain degrees if they reasonably expect a business related job?

Do college experiences and academic rigor reveal higher achieving employees?

Is undergraduate education a minimum standard for a more enlightened society? Or a way to hold separation between classes of people and status?

Is a masters degree the new way to differentiate yourself where the undergrad degree was before?

Edit: multiple typos, I guess that's proof that I should have done more college 😄

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] redfox 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What do you mean?

[–] candywashing 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So usually if it's hard to see where the domain name is, it's not a good sign

[–] redfox 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I just copied/pasted from google news feed. Good point. I'll try to edit with direct link.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That link has trackers in it, mainly google's amp.

Consider posting direct or "clean" links if you care about those things. Everyone who clicks on it is getting farmed and depending on your set up, google knows you shared it. They use this info for making relationships of online communities, which they sell to highest bidder including for political campaigns and business interest among pedestrian marketing purposes.

[–] redfox 5 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I didn't check because I was on my phone. It's a reasonable call out. I don't like the data mining either. Thanks.