this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
174 points (94.8% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jobby@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago (27 children)

Sorry?!?! I totally support what the guy stood for. Putin is a shitstain.

[–] robinn_IV@hexbear.net 41 points 2 years ago (17 children)

I totally support what the guy stood for.

Navalny was a driving force in the annual anti-Muslim, antisemitic, anti-immigrant “Russian March” in Moscow. Its central themes are “Take Back Russia,” “Russia for Russians” and “Stop Feeding the Caucasus” — the latter a demand to end federal subsidies to poorer, less-developed, largely Muslim regions of Russia. He has a video ad calling Central Asian and Muslim peoples of the Caucasus in Russia “cockroaches that must be exterminated” while implying people should go out and shoot them.

[–] jobby@lemmy.today 11 points 2 years ago (15 children)

Interesting. I guess I, and most other people in the West just assumed he was anti-Putin and therefore good.

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Huh that's weird that's exactly what we've been saying the entire time and we've been called every fucking name in the book by you smug dipshit liberals.

Now take this sudden realization that you had no idea about the person until the media told you about him 6 months ago and the media intentionally propped him up as a hero despite all that and apply it to the entire war.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Gonna be getting a lot of use out of this

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

Sure would be nice if there was any actual benefit to it but instead we just get called Russian bots or children who don't understand the vast complexities of the things we keep predicting 2 years I'm advance.

[–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

At large, they were wrong about the military buildup at the border not being for an actual invasion.

Dialectical materialism is just such an effective analytical tool that those who can apply it to current events wind up at accurate conclusions far more frequently than those who can't.

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

"They" once again being liberals.

A bunch of people were saying that it was about to happen, specifically people with access to information that would make them qualified to make that prediction.

Those same people are now saying ukraine has no way to win.

Its just that, once again, the entirety of the liberal media hegemony lied to you to maintain the status quo.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)