this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
35 points (69.7% liked)

Out of the loop

13275 readers
1 users here now

A community that helps people stay up to date with things going on.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, he risked his life and safety to get the information out,. That makes him a hero.

As for breaking the law, he did his duty as a human and thats more important than upholding injustice.

No one should have to “face the consequences” of authoritarians.

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who exactly are you referring to as an authoritarian? The Obama administration?

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The US government as a whole.

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sure seems like stretching the definition of that word to the point where it's meaningless.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think applying authoritarianism to a government as a whole is stretching the definition to being meaningless?

Alrighty then.

No, I think applying it to governments which do not meet the definition of authoritarian makes it meaningless, particularly when there are real authoritarian governments that you can easily contrast to (like for example the one in the country Snowden fled to).