this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
483 points (96.9% liked)

News

36909 readers
3258 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The group of more than a dozen masked individuals marched wearing red shirts and black pants, waving flags with swastikas on them. It is not clear at this time who the group is or affiliated with, though many of the shirts said "Blood Tribe."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

People have to step up and denounce this stuff publically, openly and loudly enough everywhere. And I don't mean causing violence, attacking or assaulting anyone in any way. I mean more people should step up and just state how they do not accept this and pressure their government representatives to act and do something and say something to discourage individuals like this.

If people are silent, and don't know about it then they are just the ignorant masses.

If they are silent but know that it is happening but still say nothing ... then they are complicit, because their silence is an acceptance of movements like this.

American is slowly diving into a rabbit hole that the world already visited almost a century ago.

It's easy to deal with now and it's easy to stand up and tell everyone you don't accept this.

The longer everyone stays silent and passive, the more their chances of saying anything evaporates.

When it goes on for too long and too far .... it takes far more energy and activism to stop this ugly movement.

The last time it went too far ... it took a world war and millions of dead everywhere in order to stop it ... and even then, it wasn't stopped, it was just merely controlled and brought down to a manageable level because it never really disappeared.

[–] DABDA@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well said.

Principiis obsta et respice finem — 'Resist the beginnings' and 'Consider the end.'

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Principiis obsta et respice finem — ‘Resist the beginnings’ and ‘Consider the end.’

Thank you for sending me down this path of little research

They Thought They Were Free, by Milton Mayer (written in 1955)

As Mayer's Nazi friend noted, "I do not see, even now [how we could have stopped it]. Many, many times since it all happened I have pondered that pair of great maxims, Principiis obsta and Finem respice - 'Resist the beginnings' and 'consider the end.' But one must foresee the end in order to resist, or even see, the beginnings. One must foresee the end clearly and certainly and how is this to be done, by ordinary men or even by extraordinary men?"

Some notes taken from this blog - https://www.thomhartmann.com/blog/2005/11/they-thought-they-were-free

Milton Mayer - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_Mayer

They Thought They Were Free - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/They_Thought_They_Were_Free

August Heckscher, the chief writer of editorials of the New York Herald Tribune, wrote that the book "suggests how easy it is for human beings in any society to fall prey to a dynamic political movement, provided their lives are sufficiently insecure, frustrated or empty."[1] He stated that the book is simultaneously a discussion on ethics, on "how political tyranny is established", and on issues in Germany and the "German mentality".

= = = = = = = =

Thanks for sharing this little tidbit ... Now I have to go a read the book for myself

[–] DABDA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I really should have mentioned that book is where I got that from, glad you were able to find it and for spreading awareness of it with your update.

Overall I enjoyed the book but it wasn't what I was expecting going in based on that large block (mostly included on that blog link) about the slow boiling of fascism. Super depressing subject to be reading about not out of historical curiosity but increasing modern relevance :(

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Brits didn’t defeat Mosley and his fascism with denouncements.

In October 1937 in Liverpool, he was knocked unconscious by two stones thrown by crowd members after he delivered a fascist salute to 8,000 people from the top of a van in Walton.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The idiots in the news story are a small group of masked thugs that don't even want to be identified. So they would be far easier to denounce with words and counter protest.

Mosley was an open political leader that plastered his name everywhere and led mass public rallies that had a sizeable following. He also had a lot of political support and funding by wealthy backers who believed in this movement. Even the royal family had deep and sympathetic connections to fascist and far right ideology. At the point in history at the height of his movement ... there was not much else to do than to throw a stone at his face to stop him from going further.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why not denounce them while throwing stones?

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Then you would be no better than them

100 people denouncing 10 people is far more convincing than 1 person using violence against 10 opponents because those ten people now have the excuse to use more violence to promote their movement.

Start with education, awareness, promotion, public support and campaigning against these movements .... violence only comes when there are no more options left and there is no longer anything else to lose.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Nice pontificating. I don’t disagree. I’m glad you still have that luxury. I’ll find a nice brick and save it for you if the shit hits the fan.

Edit: See ya in 7 months.