this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
136 points (99.3% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Raebxeh@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago (9 children)

This is a common pattern. Awoo is very good about engaging with liberals in good faith and asking questions that would be easy to answer if the person answering them has a genuine interest in the topic. For some reason, she tends to get ignored. Seems like a thankless task, really.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

I always enjoy seeing awoos polite takedowns and the stunning silence they leave, because I can always point to them when the intruding lib inevitably complains about being treated rudely and people not engaging in good faith. It's like a failsafe. This is a perfect example.

@Awoo@hexbear.net thank you for your service rat-salute-2

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

It's so easy to genuinely engage with them and expose the fact that they actually don't know anything about the topic.

For most of us here, who have an understanding that goes waaaaay beyond that of reading a fucking wikipedia article, it's super easy to get into details that simply aren't covered by them and make them feel out of their depth.

I take this approach because the silence many of them leave is deafening and exposes a lot. But, for a rare few, it makes them actually think about how they don't know anything. For some of them they simply have never had it exposed to themselves that their entire understanding is derived from quickly glossing over a wiki article. The ones that cite wikipedia are the most obvious examples of this, these are the ones with the lowest understanding.

And if they do engage? Well some of them actually end up doing some critical thinking. I find people tend to be more willing to engage over China things than Ukraine. I think people feel more self-assured that what they know about China is true so their confidence levels to engage are higher. It's the lack of confidence that causes them to ignore me @Raebxeh@hexbear.net

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Magician@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Please change your avatar picture to a condescending bust.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)