this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
72 points (91.9% liked)

News

37090 readers
2329 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Could that headline have less information?

"Sources say the shooting was related to someone wanting to hurt someone else. Bullets were possibly fired in anger. Blood may have come out of one or more wounds."

[–] neptune@dmv.social 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

In the US we need to differentiate between the Taxi Driver/Columbine variety from the "why I oughtta" variety.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago

The bullets do not differentiate.

The people that got hurt & even died from getting trampled as people shoved to get away from the active mass shooting event did not differentiate either.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

And it's so stupid. As if the reason for a mass shooting matters.

[–] neptune@dmv.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don't you think that if we are ever going to stop this kind of thing we have to address the reasons? When tiny disputes erupt in gun fire, that's a very good reason to implement more gun control. It's evidence that widespread gun availability does NOT actually make us safer. When it's an unmedicated kid killing strangers or whatever, then people get to hide behind the "we don't know why this happened, if only there was a good guy with a gun" etc.

To the victims, yeah it probably matters little. To people reading headlines? Yeah terrorism is different than school shooting type crimes which are different from your average "this is why guns are banned at bars".

[–] GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 years ago

IT'S THE GUNS DUDE

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It does.

It could be terrorism when it's in a crowded stadium. It could be gang related, which means it's part of a larger continuous conflict. It could just be drunk idiots.

If it were the first option that would have major ramifications for the safety of stadiums and other large functions. More rules, less attendance, etc.

If it's drunk idiots, we'll arrest them, treat the victims, put another entry in the book of reasons why there shouldn't be open carry in crowded venues, and move on.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It seems to me like both have major ramifications for the safety of large functions.

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, we just can't get our government to care. But if it smells like terrorism, we have a track record of invading people about it. And not necessarily the people responsible.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do we, though? Neither of them should have access to guns.

[–] neptune@dmv.social 3 points 2 years ago

Yes but making that argument might be a bit easier if it's shown that MORE GUNS doesn't really equal more good guys with guns, it means more people in arguments that end up deadly.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It rules out a politically motivated shooting which is something. Still vague but it’s more info than we had yesterday.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I'm nutritious and delicious