this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
52 points (98.1% liked)

World News

49500 readers
1690 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Key word: directly. Banks may say that they won't fund fossil fuels but doesn't mean the money will disappear. Someone else can get the money for them. What Barclays has essentially done is add extra step for oil companies to get their financing. Remember people, banks and corporations are not are our friends. Anytime they claim to take up a social cause - be it climate action, LGBT issues or what have you- it is not for our benefit but for the benefit of their bottom line.

[–] NaibofTabr 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Eh, if it's adding friction to the process of getting funding then it's a step in the right direction. Indirect usually means more time consuming, more complicated, more expensive and generally less available overall, which means that fewer companies will actually complete the process.

If they have to go through a middleman it makes this far less attractive. That means money lost paying the middleman and a lot of extra time spent communicating through them. Imposing extra costs is actually a very effective way to influence business decisions.