this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
186 points (97.0% liked)

World News

49701 readers
4329 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine’s Defence Intelligence claims it has confirmed the use of Starlink satellite communications by Russian forces in occupied areas.

It says it has intercepted conversations which indicate the Starlink terminals are being used to provide internet access to Russia’s 83rd Air Assault Brigade operating in the Donetsk region.

Ukraine’s claim follows revelations about the satellite system’s use in the war made in a biography of Starlink’s owner Elon Musk, written by Walter Isaacson.

According to an excerpt from the book, Musk secretly ordered his engineers to turn off his company’s Starlink satellite communications network near the Crimean coast last year to disrupt a Ukrainian sneak attack on the Russian naval fleet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 54 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Didn't Musk propose a peace plan that just gave Russia everything they wanted? Why wouldn't he give them Internet access?

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The American government /was/ paying for starlink (as it is not sustainable, nevermind profitable by itself. Shockingly few people in the middle of nowhere can't pay for infinite rocket launches). They said the service wasn't good enough to keep paying for it.

So now Musk doesn't care about trying to apease the Americans and will seemingly let Russia use it. Why not

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Because Musk's businesses operate in the US and are subject to US sanctions.

Hopefully there will be consequences - although that might depend who is in the White House next year.

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Because Musk's businesses operate in the US and are subject to US sanctions.

Exactly, if this story checks out, it's time he as person and all other Putin loving friends are fully sanctioned, and put on the list.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There should be. This seems like an open and shut case of disregarding sanctions which is a huge no-no. I believe George Bluth refered to it as "light treason". Gets extra juicy since it's being used by the military of an enemy of the state. Wonder how much of US weaponry or aid to Ukraine has suffered from an attack using Starlink.

"We didn't realise." would not cut it. That's direct opposition to the intent of the US. That's going against your country.