this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
568 points (99.8% liked)

196

18169 readers
302 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 81 points 2 years ago (16 children)

Good solution is to tax land. The land value tax cannot be passed on to tenants, both in economic theory and in observed practice.

Plus, it's just a super good tax. Progressive, hard to evade, super efficient, incentivizes density and disincentivizes sprawl. It's so good that economists of all different ideologies agree, from free-market libertarians like Milton Friedman to New Keynesians and social democrats like Joseph Stiglitz.

We should be taxing land, not labor.

[–] HardlyCrabbing@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree that taxing land is a good idea, but it's really hard to do in practice. How you put a value on land?

Income tax is easy to put a value on, because it's right there on your pay slip. But what's the value of land?

[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

http://gameofrent.com/content/can-land-be-accurately-assessed

The key downsides of income taxes, though, are it requires tracking everyone's income, and it's very easy to hide income by doing under-the-table work and getting paid in cash. In contrast, it's impossible to hide land.

load more comments (14 replies)