this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

40156 readers
112 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 38 points 2 years ago (28 children)

So, the electronic parts appear to be 100% non-user-repairable. I'm sure Apple's main motivation was to reduce the size and weight, but this is still a $3500 disposable item. Has anyone identified the "killer app" yet?

[–] tesseract@beehaw.org 16 points 2 years ago (10 children)

The main motivation isn't to reduce size and weight. The main motivation is to squeeze the customers for the last ounce of revenue.

The claim that reparability has to be sacrificed for reduction in size and weight is a lie that they reinforced through repetition. They can achieve it without that sacrifice if they wanted to - but it won't help their perpetual double digit profit growth target.

[–] sanzky@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Im sorry but this is not correct. Most design decisions are a trade-off, you gain something but you loose something. You might argue that reparability should have a higher priority than size, but saying that you can be more repairable without gaining any size is nonsense.

[–] Ludrol@szmer.info 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

For VR it makes sense as lenses and displays are super fragile and need to be aligned to sub mm precision. But still the battery pack shoudn't use the proprietary connector for the battery.

[–] sanzky@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Im not sure. you dont want to use anything that might disconnect easily. The battery pack does have an additional USB-C plug to 'daisy chain' it to other power source.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)