this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
1286 points (96.1% liked)

memes

20792 readers
2008 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] squidspinachfootball@lemm.ee 30 points 2 years ago (17 children)

Frankly this catch phrase never made any sense to me, from a logical point of view.

It assumes that:

  1. If buying = owning then pirating* = stealing, because you own it without buying.

  2. And if buying =/= owning then pirating =/= stealing, because you can't own it otherwise.

But the justification in the second statement is completely irrelevant to the first statement. You still own it without buying. It's still stealing.

UNLESS - we examine what "stealing" is. This is where the arguments about being in a digital space vs. a physical space comes in. Where the question is raised: Is making an exact copy really "stealing"? Or, consider what is being "stolen"? The original item? The idea? We need to think about this more.

But it's here the argument should be made and here the debate should be. That's where "pirates" have a chance of winning. Let's get rid of this flawed, easily repeatable, but fundamentally incorrect catch phrase and come up with a better one already. One that makes sense.

*(Nevermind that most of you technically aren't even pirating, you're just downloading the fruits of someone else that pirated.)

[–] mac 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

What field uses =/= to mean !=?

[–] Funkytom467@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

!= isn't universal, i've mostly seen it used in programming.

Otherwise ≠ is the symbol we use in maths and generally the more common one.

=/= is just the worst rendition of ≠ for people that don't know how to write it or are too lazy to go find it.

[–] mac 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah =/= is honestly a little confusing. I know != isn't universal though, gotta start making sure to use instead

[–] squidspinachfootball@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're definite not wrong, I actually went to use "!=" first. But then thought if someone wasn't familiar with programming they might not get it, so I went with the "=/=" hoping it would make sense to more people. Forgot that we're on lemmy and the audience here would generally understand lol. Didn't know ≠ existed though, will probably use that from now on. Nice!

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Have you heard of our Lord and Saviour, APL?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)