this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
288 points (95.9% liked)

PC Gaming

12049 readers
396 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

500k a month to support 19 million person play base doesn't seem totally unreasonable. They've already made £400m+ in early access in the first month - so it's a drop on the ocean at the moment.

Costs will probably come down - at the moment they've been scrambling to keep up with demand which means expensive rapid deployment rather than long term server build out.

And presumably they plan to get the game out of early access so potentially get more players (although may not get many more players in this case as it's so popular) and more importantly start rolling out DLC content to make more money.

I doubt they need to go the subscription route plus may be too late as they launched without it.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

Also, the player base will be a fraction of what it is today in a month. They're dealing with unprecedented demand that's gonna fall off into something more reasonable by throwing money at it.

It's the right thing for them to do. It would have been stupid to plan for this much demand. You'd delay the game by another year just building out a cloud native architecture. Letting the servers buckle would have killed momentum.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They can go the Minecraft route and allow players to self host servers, plus a subscription option for online servers.

[–] feminalpanda@lemmings.world 4 points 2 years ago

They do, they need to work on the code but it works.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

presumably they plan to get the game out of early access

I've heard that the company has a history of…not doing that. They apparently have a few games out that went early access and left in an unfinished state.

[–] Galaxy@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

From what I can tell their games that are in early access have not been left to languish in an unfinished state and are still getting updates

I am assuming the reason for that rumor that they just leave games unfinished has to do with people who bought their previous game Craftopia, which is very similar to Palworld but without the creatures.

In the last 6 months it seems to have been getting constant updates and fixes (about 2 a month)based on the steam changelogs, so I am not sure how that came to be seen as the game being left to die.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Because having 2 early access games at once and announcing a third is not the point of early access.

Steam should straight up ban developers from even creating any additional game pages while they have early access active.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

That's good to know, thanks!