this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
1286 points (96.1% liked)

memes

16739 readers
2534 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Imagine if we could hook up Bittorrent and Bitcoin somehow, and made it so you could create a torrent of your work and get some money when people download.

And then people who seed it could maybe get a little cut for helping to host things. And you'd buy tokens and you'd know that almost 100% of the money goes to the artist, and the artist has control over the entire process.

That would be neat, but I'm sure someone here will explain why this is unworkable and stupid. Which is why I posted it.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Imagine YouTube reposts stealing merger ad revenue but it's your main revenue instead.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's definitely a hard problem we'd have to solve.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago

"What we need are stronger copyright laws."

- Disney lawyers, probably

Eight hours later, and no one disagreed.

I think you might be on to something

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

99% of revenue would go to the first copycats that can feasibly pretend the works are theirs, and dominate the space with their own seeder bots.

Democracy is nice, but…it needs a bit of regulation and enforcement. You’d end up slowly building up a lot of the rules that currently dictate digital purchases, sans corruption.

[–] jimbo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You don't need special digital scam money to do this. You can just go buy the thing directly from the creator/the creator's agent. If the creator wanted to go through the trouble of self-publishing, they'd have just done that.