this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
32 points (97.1% liked)
PC Gaming
12034 readers
551 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm honestly surprised they can even use the DS name. I assumed Nintendo had trademarked that in every way possible
"DS" Stand for dual screen. Is it a descriptive element, and not a distinctive element.
Well yes but actually no. The phrase "dual screen" is descriptive yes. But that is not what Nintendo called their product. The official name for the Nintendo DS is, well, Nintendo DS. So they very well could have trademarked the "DS" naming to keep for themselves for all eternity. Especially since they could argue that the shortened "DS" is distinctive since it is an abbreviation and not just a plain description.
All I'm saying is I'm surprised the asshole suits at Nintendo didn't do it, don't know if they tried but failed though.
They would only have the trademark as long as they're still using it. I don't think there's anything first-party still in active development for any DS platform, but it's still recent enough.
It might just not have caught their attention yet.