this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
279 points (99.3% liked)

politics

22212 readers
25 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Once again you misquote “social fascist” as “fascist” despite being corrected on this very error in another conversation. You are here in bad faith. Social fascist is a specific thing.

Fascists shouldn’t be shot, they should be re-educated. Only those who engage in crimes should be shot. I explained this to you and you still regress back to your liberal baseline

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Good faith is phrasing your side of a disagreement as "I corrected you"

[–] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

It’s repeating the same objectively incorrect argument over and over, changing the definitions of terms to twist it into what you want. Social fascism is not just simply “fascism”. This is a fact that you ignore. All fascists don’t deserve to be shot, not even the most hardline Stalinists shot every single fascist - they re-educated them if possible

You refuse to use the accepted definition of social fascists among communists and instead jump to a different term. Even when you know you shouldn’t and have been corrected on this leap, you do it again and again because you are a Liberal incapable of processing new information

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

I don't think that he is truely here in bad faith, but they do seem to get hung up about optics for a wide general audience over things we say on a communist forum for reasons i don't understand. I argued with him before about how he took some issue with how we use the word cracker here, and it was more or less the same thing as this.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You know what, i ending up argueing more with them and you're right lol.

They refuse to accept what the quote actually means, but we're all "cranks" and "too online" for understanding it. Just total liberal bullshit.

[–] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Some people may think I go to hard but I’m quite good at smelling these people out