this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
20 points (65.2% liked)

/0

2048 readers
3 users here now

Meta community. Discuss about this lemmy instance or lemmy in general.

Service Uptime view

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am curious what can be done about the Lemmy.World era of botting corpo comments to protect their investments?

Anything remotely federated w/ LW has a massive hard-on for corporations (anti-piracy boot-lickers only added us back when we had the largest community in the fediverse), racism (you ain't american, you aint right), a desire to troll/argue in bad faith, and a general "fuck you, I have 500 accounts to down-vote with."

I myself have over 60 accounts on Lemmy.World; and because of that, I am 100% certain somebody has a type of SMM portal to scan for keywords and upvote/downvote accordingly.

Don't believe me?

Go post about Apple, Facebook, Tesla, or any other 1% owned entity, and watch which accounts upvote/downvote in less time than required to read the post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrCookieRespect@reddthat.com 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Lemmy.world is the worst. It should be defederated by everyone.

Especially because their admins are very bad people.

https://sh.itjust.works/comment/5160618

https://lemmy.ca/post/8810527

Found that to be a great example.

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Lemmy.World TOS Section Labeled "Our Rights"

6.0: You are solely and entirely responsible for your use of the website and your computer, internet, and data security.

6.1: You waive Lemmy.World and its parent, subsidiaries, affiliates, and all their respective staff, representatives, service providers, contractors, licensors, licensees, and successors from any claims resulting from any action taken by Lemmy.World, and any of the foregoing parties relating to any investigations by either us or by law enforcement authorities.

6.2: In the case of a violation of the Terms of Service, here is what may happen:

6.2.0: Removal of the violating content, and asking you to not repeat it again.
6.2.1: Being warned for the second time, and having your account temporarily suspended.
6.2.2: Adding temporary or permanent limitations to Lemmy.World communities, such as applying NSFW tags or restricting the posting of new content by users.
6.2.3: Removal of all content associated with the violating party.
6.2.4: Banishing of communities.
6.2.5: Permanent banishing of user accounts.
[–] MrCookieRespect@reddthat.com 14 points 2 years ago

That TOS isn't even legal in USA.

Even less so in EU.

[–] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Wow. That is some real incompentency.

I'm kinda tempted to make a gpdr request and fuck them up when they fuck it up.

Not gonna do that because gpdr is an absolute fucked piece of law, and I dont want to open that can of worms, but I'm still tempted.

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

I think open-invite servers like that are asking for trouble. Maybe not a de-federation, but a safer space from the bot swarm I'm seeing.

[–] gullible@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Moderation federation is very spotty and always has been. I’ve cumulatively spent a few hours checking and it’s consistently inconsistent. Not to mention the fact that the referenced post was made after a user tried to make .world their personal drama blog using several accounts. This and the other post strike me as faux indignation.

[–] MrCookieRespect@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah antik is a admin there however...

And its not about them removing not enough... Not at all.

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

First link doesn't lead anywhere?

[–] MrCookieRespect@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Open in new tab or external, it definitely works.

[–] Blaze@discuss.online 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It does now, don't know what happened yesterday

[–] MrCookieRespect@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago

No worries. Maybe it was the instance