this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
140 points (97.9% liked)

Chemistry

724 readers
1 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

/s? I feel like that tech has been "20 years away" for like 50 years now...

[–] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This graph shows projections for how long it was predicted to take to develop fusion power depending on the funding. Graph showing how long it should take to develop fusion power. There are five lines, "maximum effective effort" ending in 1990, "accelerated" in 1993, "aggressive" in 1998, "moderate" in 2005, and "fusion never" which never ends. The line showing actual funding is below "fusion never".

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So if a billionaire actually decided to fund it, we might have it? It appears that the actual amount of funding is below the "fusion never" line.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

They'd have to throw in like 10 billion a year for over a decade, so we probably need a couple of the worlds richest billionaires