this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
109 points (99.1% liked)

news

23464 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] D61@hexbear.net 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure there's codified legal precedent that the USA Police have no responsibility to put their lives in danger to protect civilians.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 40 points 2 years ago (3 children)

CW Violence:

Lozito v. New York City

In the spring of 2012, Joseph Lozito, who was brutally stabbed and "grievously wounded, deeply slashed around the head and neck", sued police for negligence in failing to render assistance to him as he was being attacked by Gelman.[20][21][22] Lozito told reporters that he decided to file the lawsuit after allegedly learning from "a grand-jury member" that NYPD officer Terrance Howell testified that he hid from Gelman before and while Lozito was being attacked because Howell thought Gelman had a gun.[23][24] In response to the suit, attorneys for the City of New York argued that police had no duty to protect Lozito[25] or any other person from Gelman.[23]

On July 25, 2013, Judge Margaret Chan dismissed Lozito's suit, stating that while Lozito's account of the attack rang true and appeared "highly credible", Chan agreed that police had "no special duty" to protect Lozito.[20][21][26]

Lozito later went on to give an account of the aftermath in an article published by Cracked.com in October 2013,[27] and again in October 2017 when he narrated a video, offering his perspective of the event and as a warning to others involved in similar situations. Lozito also shared his experience pertaining to the attack in an episode of Radiolab podcast titled "No special duty."[28]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maksim_Gelman_stabbing_spree

[–] viva_la_juche@hexbear.net 34 points 2 years ago

I think about shit like this every time they want to increase police budgets under the guise of “public safety”

[–] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago

Lozito later went on to give an account of the aftermath in an article published by Cracked.com

Man no other outlet was willing to take his story? Geez lol

[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] viva_la_juche@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yeah, there’s more than one Supreme Court decision that say police have no duty to protect a civilian from harm unless you’re in their custody or something (and obv that’s fudgible)

[–] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They have the duty to allow you to be eaten alive by bedbugs

or boiled alive in a prison shower