this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
796 points (97.8% liked)

Work Reform

13382 readers
317 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 332 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

Doesn't even question what employees are possibly doing. Just says there are too many and they must be put out on the street. Says the people who are left are making too much money.

I say this a lot but....seriously....when do we start burning things?

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 69 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

My hatred of the owner class is matched only by my disappointment in my fellow humans for not only taking it, but often defending it.

The people we struggle for have abandoned their humanity. That's what it takes to be one of society's supposed winners or be in their good graces: practiced sociopathy.

And half of the peasants fantasize about being the sociopaths instead of ending their reign and this despicable con game of an economy.

[–] setInner234@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Summed up concisely. I've unfortunately given up hope that anything can be done or can improve. It feels the fight, whatever fight there ever was, has been lost.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fuck that. I will not go gently into that good night. I will rage against the dying of the light.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh ya? Is your rage posting on lemmy? How’s that working out?

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] lickmygiggle@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m genuinely not super revolutionary but I didn’t get halfway through this letter before coming to the realization that this person needed to not exist anymore and same for anybody else of the same ilk.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you don't have a list of people in society that need to burn you aren't paying attention hard enough.

[–] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can't afford that much paper

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Which is another reason we need to start burning things. can't even afford paper.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“Man, if I just had the Death Note.”

[–] CallumWells@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Holy hell, if some fairly rational person got such a book and did their research on who needs to be written down the world would probably look a lot different in a short amount of time.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yeah, I'm not sure I really get this whole "reduce employment" logic. Like if some product just isn't profitable and you lay off the employees you hired to work on it, that's not surprising, but if the employees are doing something profitable, and you actually needed to hire that many to get whatever it was you hired them for done, shouldn't it be more profitable to a company to keep them, even if one had a large number?

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Moreover, if all the oligarchs are doing it, and they are, who will be left to buy their products/services?

They're breaking their own ponzi scheme economy for a few more quarterly profit boosts because there's nowhere else to grow/metastasize. Media companies are making less media. Food makers are making less product types. Their profit is coming out of gutting workers and their ability to produce what their economic sector produced in the first place.

This is a terminal stage market capitalism fire sale. The snake is eating its own tail having conquered the board.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because this is the End of the Line. The snake has found its tail and Oroborous awakens to transform the end into the beginning. An ideology of everlasting consumption will eventually consume itself.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Especially on a finite world with finite resources.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Bold of you to assume the stock market has anything to do with finite resources.

When the ultra wealthy and their companies run the system into the ground they will buy up the failed stocks and cheap land that nobody else can afford then come out ahead when the economy recovers like they have in the previous economic crashes. They can afford to buy low and cash out when it is high because they have zero pressure to act at any given point in time due to their ridiculous wealth and zero legal repercussions.

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But even then there reaches a point where they run out of things to buy, and people to buy them from.

Eventually they poison the one thing they worship: the sanctity of private property rights. It has to serve at least some portion of the populace if it's going to remain tenable, but they're doomed to discover and undershoot that number.

The Western world spent a century demonising socialism with "they'll take your home and car" but it rings hollow when you have neither.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I cannot afford an emergency. Bring in the socialist, if it is houses they take, and cars they enamor, surely they will leave me be.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Bold of you to assume they were talking about the stock market

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Upthread:

This is a terminal stage market capitalism fire sale. The snake is eating its own tail having conquered the board.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And? How do you get stock market from that? They are obviously talking about the economy as a whole and not the stock market

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The stock market is the reason for chasing quarterly profits and a massive part of what gets counted as the economy. It is the main driver of all the shitty late stage capitalism practices we are discussing.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The stock market is certainly part of the problem but it’s not everything.

Capitalism in its entirety is the issue. Capitalism is based on infinite growth which is unsustainable and impossible.

The stock market is just a tool to extract wealth from the populace. Without the stock market it would still happen but with less efficiency.

You have the same problems with or without stocks.

[–] instamat@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

They’re not thinking long term, they want immediate and maximum profits

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

It makes quarterlys look good immediately before the problems show up later

It's the mindset of someone who wants to cash out which is usually all ultracapitalists

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Because he doesn't care. He's looking out for himself.

"Hey Googs, you have too many employees and that's cutting in my investments. Shitcan 150,000 so my investments go up and I make more billions kthxbye"

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The funny thing is... what are the operational requirements of an R&D organization?

As far as I can see, it's nothing, by definition.

Anyway, does the rich person there not understand that? Also, what is the value of an R&D organization where people are demotivated?

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don't need to burn things, the letter is already addressed by that which needs to be burned.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)