this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
44 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22212 readers
25 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drinkinglakewater@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago (4 children)

This is a very surprising policy turn, does this mean reunification is off the table permanently or is it just a shift in priority?

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Just talking out my butt, but I imagine a shift in priority. Every documentary I've seen of people in the DPRK they talk about their hope for reunification because so many have family on the other side. With the US ramping up shitfest levels across the globe I can see how there could be a need to shift priorities and stance towards trying to seem as big and dangerous as possible. It's not as if the western world is responding to peaceful overtures anyway.

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The US is responding to prospective peace talks by forcing the ROK not to engage in them.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

Yeah. Reminds me of Parenti on Reagan regarding the USSR, "He refused to take yes for an answer."

load more comments (1 replies)