this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
222 points (98.7% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

3938 readers
1 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 75 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Not that any of it makes sense, but what is the alive vs dead part about? What is their "logic" as to why there is any difference?

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 123 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

You "summon" spirits, aka dead people. Since they're alive, they can't be summoned. They should instead be invited. That's my guess.

Is all cirque du soleil levels of mental gymnastics and logical jumps to conclusions.

Alto notice, "my person" for they think legally they're different from their legal ID. And the idea that they must only respond to a crime charges if there's a person injured. As they have weird beliefs of how private property and crimes against property work, due to their weird misconception of legality.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

Pffft. Lol. That's probably it. It's mind-blowing that people like this exist. Such stupidity.

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wow, instead of being "three bricks short of a load" these people are like a few pallets short.

I've seen like 3 or 4 of these posts recently on here and IMO they're more odd than all the QAnon posts.

[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

they’re more odd than all the QAnon posts

Those two Venn diagrams are nearly a circle.

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

True, maybe because QAnon has been "normalized" since it has been in the news for years now, but these people just seem so much more bizarre to me.

[–] mibo80@lemm.ee 50 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's what I've noticed the most about these Sovereign Shitizens - they think legalese is just spinning words and they can just identify their legal status based on their own definitions thereof. They all lack one basic understanding of sovereignty - enforcement and self-defense. If you truly are sovereign prove it. Repel the invasion of our military and you will have earned your sovereignty.

[–] DharkStare@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They're convinced that legalese is a magical language and if they say the right words in the right way, they'll become immune to the law.

They remind me of Cargo Cults.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There’s one other piece besides defending yourself. Building a collation of entities that acknowledge your sovereignty. Guess their probability of that happening.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Uh they would just all get together like a bunch of Jerry's and shake each other's hands "oh YOU agree sovereign" "no you are sovereign"

[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Me and the squad endorsing each other’s LinkedIn skills

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

lmao thanks for the laughs

[–] BaronVonBort@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

SCs are really nothing but misinterpretations and word salad and jumping to conclusions. Reading their stuff is an exercise in losing your mind.