this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
47 points (98.0% liked)

movies

22818 readers
5 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is this my nerdiest post? Yes. Anyway,

The Star Trek wiki had something interesting...

Paul Schneider modeled the Romulans on the ancient Romans, naming the species' homeworlds after the mythical founders of Rome, Romulus and Remus. "It was a matter of developing a good Romanesque set of admirable antagonists that were worthy of Kirk," Schneider related. "I came up with the concept of the Romulans which was an extension of the Roman civilization to the point of space travel, and it turned out quite well." (Captains' Logs: The Unauthorized Complete Trek Voyages, p. 34) D.C. Fontana reckoned that Schneider basing the aliens on the pre-existing Roman civilization was the cause for the writer receiving insufficient credit for creating the Romulans. ("Balance of Terror" Starfleet Access, TOS Season 1 Blu-ray) Gene Roddenberry, interested in ancient Rome himself, approved of the initial depiction of the Romulan species. "He loved Paul's having endowed the enemy-Romulans with the militaristic character of the ancient Romans," wrote John D.F. Black and Mary Black. (Star Trek: The Magazine Volume 2, Issue 11, p. 19) Roddenberry's original concept of the Romulans, however, was that they represented 1960s' Chinese Communists.

Yes, Romulans are somewhat based on the Roman Empire and are xenophobic conquerers, but Westerners often ignorantly attribute these traits to communist countries anyway.

Then there is the Klingons, again, the Klingons are nothing like communists, (they're a patriarchal empire) and yet I've seen people say they were based on the Soviets.

So what do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Man I should go back and finish DS9

[–] 1simpletailer@startrek.website 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It may not have gained the mainstream appeal of TOS and TNG, but DS9 is Trek at its absolute best. It is also Trek at its most overtly leftist. A cast that would be considered diverse today back in the 90's, an anti-facist insurgency portrayed in a nuanced but mostly positive light, absolutely biting racial commentary, a main character that could be considered a trans allegory, and one of tvs first homosexual kisses (again, in the 90s) to name just a few things. The entire series is about leftist ideals and convictions being tested and it's asperational AF. It's not perfect by any means, it had to make it on American television after all, but rarely does something so overtly leftist do just that. I recommend any comrades who haven't seen it check out the episodes "Bar Association" and "Far Beyond the Stars".

[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

:quark: :rommunism: :dax-stoked:

hexbear is severely lacking in DS9 emotes

One of this sites many injustices is the lack of antifa Kira emojis.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

Time for you to be the change you want in the world...

[–] Aryuproudomenowdaddy@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Like the ending of DS9 probably has the most wild finale of any Trek show to date but the series as a whole is very good, especially in the later seasons when the Dominion war is in full swing.

[–] glans@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Apparently they wanted to fully kill off Sisko but Avery Brooks made a huge stink about it saying it wasn't right, so it is some sort of compromise.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

He wanted Sisko to promise to return cause he didn't want to depict a black man abandoning his son. Being killed was never on the table he was gonna just permantly and willingly go join the prophets

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What? Voyager and Enterprise both have waaaaaay more wack finales.

I mean Sisko ascends to godhood, which I guess isn't the first time that a character has become a higher life form but it still felt kind of out of place for ST if that makes sense.

[–] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

You really should, you're depriving yourself something beautiful

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

It's the beat trek