this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
39 points (71.4% liked)

politics

25236 readers
3872 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a matchup between Biden and Trump, many young voters say they might choose silence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (8 children)

The inability to move the needle on student loan forgiveness and school shootings is going to hurt him to some degree.

But at the same time, it's not like Trump is going to even ATTEMPT to do anything about student loans or school shootings.

We need to be clear with non-voters, the issues that are driving you to sit out are not the issues you should be worried about.

Joe Biden is selling weapons to Israel! Yes, weapons they don't actually need to commit the war crimes they are committing.

Meanwhile Trump:

https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/16/politics/trump-american-jews-israel/index.html

"No President has done more for Israel than I have."

Here's what you should be worried about:

Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are both well past retirement age. Trump could very well ask them to step down so he can appoint someone younger.

He already did that with Justice Kennedy.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/06/donald-trump-justice-anthony-kennedy-retirement

That would give Trump 5 picks on the Supreme Court and lock in a dystopian nightmare of rulings for the rest of our lives.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

How has he been unable to move the needle on student loan forgiveness when substantial amount of loans have already been forgiven and more are in the works? Not being able to forgive 100% of them counts as being 100% unable to do any of it?

This is only the most recent one

https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/biden-harris-administration-announces-nearly-5-billion-additional-student-debt-relief

the only way that effort will continue is if Biden or another Dem is in office because there’s no way the GOP will help.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The improvements that have been made apply to a TINY minority of people and even in that group, they may not qualify. On top of that, continuing to ask people to pay isn't REALLY "forgiveness" now, is it?

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/16/how-to-qualify-for-bidens-fast-tracked-student-loan-forgiveness.html

"The SAVE option reduces the monthly federal student loan payments for undergraduate borrowers from 10% of discretionary income to 5%, and shortens the timeline to forgiveness for those with small balances from the usual required 20 years or 25 years. Those who took out $12,000 or less in their undergraduate or graduate postsecondary studies get any remaining debt erased after just a decade."

So:

We're still going to ask you to pay, you just have to pay 5% of your income instead of 10%.

If you took out student loans less than $12K (who DOES that?) the debt can be erased after 10 years instead of 20 to 25 years.

That's not forgiveness. That's not what people are looking for.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)