this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
141 points (94.9% liked)

World News

49186 readers
1720 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, has called for a change to the constitution to identify South Korea as the “number one hostile state”, ending the regime’s commitment to unifying the Korean peninsula.

In a speech to the supreme people’s assembly – North Korea’s rubber-stamp parliament – Kim said he no longer believed unification was possible and accused the South of attempting to foment regime change and promote unification by stealth.

In another sign of quickly deteriorating ties between the two Koreas, which ended their 1950-53 war with a truce but not a peace treaty – Kim said: “We don’t want war, but we have no intention of avoiding it.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm not really all that surprised. Unification would likely mean the existing North Korean political elite would be criminals at best or dead at worst.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 11 points 2 years ago

Might be an unpopular opinion, but I'm all for offering them cushy gilded cages to live out the rest of their lives. If that's what it takes to end the regime, then go for it.

It's not like there's a long list of would-be dictators who are emboldened by the idea that they might land a sweet western mansion one day. There are so many other factors in taking over a country's political system that this doesn't register.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

An example, but I don't think East German leadership faced any consequences bar loss of power, after reunification.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Germany was never at war with itself and only kept apart by external states.

The only thing stopping Korea unification was a complete inability for either side to agree what unification would look like. Especially in the post-soviet world where Korea's greatest allies have always been at best tolerant of them.