this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
42 points (88.9% liked)

Canada

10296 readers
858 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Our son Ryan, 26, and the vast majority of the 42,000 who have lost lives to the toxic supply of drugs, would be alive today if their substance was legalized, regulated and controlled, like we do for alcohol users."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

A safe supply means fuck all without other extended care programs. Even these drugs when "clean" come with risks of overdose and significant risk of addiction impacting many other aspects of life. I'm all for a safe supply, if it comes with programs to help people get off them and reintegrate into society if their addiction has impacted their employment, education and housing.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 7 points 2 years ago

My understanding (which may be faulty) is that opioids, specifically, rarely cause overdose deaths if the supply is safe. Granted, "rarely" is not "never", and having the other programs does help addicts put their lives back together and kick the drugs for good, but a safe supply would keep a lot of people alive while we try to fund and ramp up those other programs.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Then you have to deal with the NIMBY crowd not wanting those services anywhere close to their precious houses and little angels.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
  1. safe supply prevents death in the next 7 days, which is an immediate problem

  2. programmes to handle the next phases of recovery would be neat, but the father-knows-best bunch keep killing those programmes because they "encourage abuse" or "those people don't deserve handouts" or whatnot.