politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
If Trump wins a lot of people will die, just like last time.
I'd ask you for a source on this nonsense but then who are we kidding right?
racist?
Unemployment when Trump left office - 6.3%
Unemployment today- 3.7%
Seems to me like more people with jobs means less people losing those things under Biden.
Their feelings are more valid than your facts... I couldn't believe I was hearing such non sense from senior Republicans but they were right about their base.
You tell me. You're clearly the expert here.
You didn't tell me.
The banks and the rich are squeezing every dime they can out of American working class, but the probable GOP nominee is the absolute wrong way to curb it.
Remember for example when he stole medical supplies and gave them to his criminal friends, who could then resell them for a higher price? During a pandemic..
What a great straw man! Thankfully it isn't Biden himself pulling the trigger, nonetheless any GOP candidate is simply not an option.
He instigated the attack, Biden did not have anything to do with the counterattack on Gaza. These are inherently different things
I agree, that he is. I think it's more complicated in terms of global security idk though
Sure. I implied US influence is global security but I also disagree with myself there
the unemployment statistic only counts people who file for unemployment, and in 2020, a lot of us were able to pull $1200 a week with no look-for-work requirement.
i don't think this is a fair comparison.
Do you have numbers showing that the levels of unemployed people not filing was dramatically different? If not, then this is meaninhless fud.
> If not, then this is meaninhless fud.
wrong. it's only meaningless "fud" if we do have the numbers and they don't support what i'm saying.
No, that's not how it works. If you're making some unsubstantiated claim, can't back it up, spreading negativity, then it's meaningless, anecdotal fud.
If you do have something to back it up, then it's not.
anecdotes aren't meaningless or fud
They aren't useful at all for making claims about large trends.
You were making claims about the full market. Stats or it didn't happen
you can see the u3 trends
huh. would you look at that?
i wonder what happened in march of 2020 to cause this!
https://kolektiva.social/system/media_attachments/files/111/761/663/868/357/809/original/390e1def2c785d9e.png
That doesn't show what I asked about or what you said.
oh my bad
Ridiculous, pure fantasy. It's too late to hold a primary. Biden beat Trump once and can do it again.
He will and you'll cry about it.
Lol, and who do you suggest we primary against Biden? I'll wait.
Way to not answer the question. Typical, though, complain but provide absolutely no alternatives or solutions.
Sure, I would too if it where in the table as an option. But alas, it seems it is not. I would venture a guess to say that the Biden administration would also take that option if it where available... But it seems to be a quagmire of unreasonable actors.