this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
53 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22212 readers
25 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've seen it pop up in quite a few threads, sometimes in jest (or sort of in-jest), but I think it comes up enough to talk about seriously, both from an individual behaviour standpoint and a broader activism/socialism/whatever standpoint.

This is also coming from someone that sees themselves as very extroverted (but also autistic and socially anxious, so pretty poor at getting my social needs met), so maybe this whole idea is way off base.

There's two narratives here for discussion in this thread:

  • I struggle with pushing myself to be social, and I am afraid this makes me a poor activist. At some point or another advocating for socialism will rely on socialists to talk to non-socialists in spaces and circumstances that are not comfortable.
  • Socialism, on some level, involves a society with more time and space to socialise. What will this look like for a severe introvert? Will there be room for a person to buy a plot of land in the hills and live separate from society forever? Will I have to go to Commissar DanceClass's Dance Class?

And two sentiments that should be discussed with those narratives re: other people:

  • Introvert, socially anxious, autistic etc. There are people they get along with and comfortable social situations, but for a variety of reasons need a break regularly
  • "I just hate people"

This whole post was a thought I had when reading the second people-hater. My initial thought was that this was an internal pathologisation of people based on the society we live in. If the only people you encounter day to day are ladder climbing suburbanites whose main interests are competitively assessing lawn heights and promotions, you're probably going to "hate people". However, this may not be the case for all people who claim this of themselves. Maybe they hate other people on the road, people in queues for groceries etc. I just find it hard to believe that someone who genuinely hates all people would hop on to a forum (an entirely social activity) and spend any amount of time there. Nonetheless, it probably happens.

But, I figured that the topic had enough range and nuance to turn into its own thread instead of responding directly, and saw someone else post the introvert activism thing.

One of the things I thought of was the social battery and how it's often expended on work and commuting. If your main social energy is spent at work/commuting, I feel like it's very possible that one might come away with a dim view of any social activity (incl. organising) and your ability to participate in it, especially if you'd largely done it since school (another cutthroat highly hierarchical social setting).

(how is commuting social? You're in a constant negotiation with other drivers to avoid bumping your 2 ton $20k machines into each other, with a wide variety of levels of aggression, empathy, engagement etc. It's not words, but there is a communication there that can be very draining)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Maybe a hot take, but introvert/extrovert is a false dichotomy that is more unhelpful than helpful. Sure, people can be more or less outgoing etc in a given situation, but to reify that into an essential trait that everyone posseses and two categories into which everyone can be divided ends up flattening the complexity of human social experience in a way that's mostly arbitrary

[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

100-com

You can really feel the shortcomings in the classifications when you get people who are like:

"See, I'm weird! Because I'm an introvert normally, but on occasion I'm extremely extroverted!"

"Does anybody else feel introverted except when they're around friends in a social situation, which then turns you into a major extrovert?"

"I dislike people, but I love spending time in nature despite being an introvert!"

"I would actually describe myself as an introverted extrovert / extroverted introvert, because..."

It's partially just not understanding what the terms mean and merely boiling them down into "Introvert = wants to stay inside literally 24/7; extrovert = wants to stay outside literally 24/7," and partially just because the terms suck even if everybody did understand the actual intended definitions of the terms. It's not just not a binary, it's a very fluid situation that varies based on the time of day, time of year, whether you have friends, how many friends you have, your current working/education situation, and dozens and dozens of other things.

I'm not entirely sure why people think it's a useful classification system to have, beyond it merely being another in-group identifier like being an INTJ or ENTP or PPB or whatever in that ridiculous personality classification system.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

My PPB score says I'm more of a hog weiner than a poopballs

[–] bigboopballs@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

like being an INTJ or ENTP or PPB

nerd avgn-horror PIGPOOPBALLS

I've worked multiple jobs where they make us to personality tests, especially Myers Briggs.

[–] Mokey@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah, agree, its mostly a simplification of always changing variables that you yourself are able to influence.