this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
16 points (86.4% liked)

Linux

8924 readers
449 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ategon@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev
16
ELI5 the whole Wayland vs X11 going on? (programming.dev)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by alexdeathway@programming.dev to c/linux@programming.dev
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Title *X11

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] pelya@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

X11 is an ancient piece of crap which no one wants to update or maintain.

Wayland is the new and better display manager.

However, many old applications only support X11, because they depend on some arcane feature not yet supported by Wayland. Hence, the drama.

[โ€“] snaggen@programming.dev 19 points 2 years ago

Also, it was easier to support X11, since there is no security. You wanted to read other applications key events, no problem. Want to read the screen, without without anyone knowing? No, problem, just read it. With Wayland you must use APIs for stuff, and you are not allowed to do everything.