I just got into an argument with a Zionist settler who claimed that in the years of austerity after the Entity was established, that it had state ownership of the means of production, ergo it was a socialist state - but that the state's mismanagement led the settlers to shift towards liberal capitalism. The settler interlocutor also stressed that there were ties between the USSR and the Zionist entity.

So basically, what's up with that, and how can I better argue against Zionism, bearing these facts in mind?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

another bit on that second point, france had the largest communist party in the west and there was some hopes that theyd take over the whole country. in 1945 they had the most votes of any party, and maintained this lead until late 50s. and before the nazi occupation, france was led by socialists (and pm leon blum was a jewish man put into a concentration camp, whose party allied with the communists), so this wasnt an unreasonable conclusion

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago

Indeed. After the second world War, communists across the globe emerged from the conflict as the heroes that saved the free world. Communist parties all over the world gave their all in the fight against fascism and the people knew who fought for their freedom.

For a brief time we were yet again at the cusp of a world revolution, evermore closer to victory than we were with the October Revolution. Yet like the tide, the wave that swept so close flowed back once more in great reaction to our victory and pushed back hard.

Now we communists of the modern period wait for the next rising tide and hope it will be the final one.