this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
100 points (99.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You nerds trying to rehab this social imperialist need to read what he actually says. He's a chauvinist of the highest degree. Keep in mind NJR lives in a country that is at war currently with DPRK, has killed millions of Koreans & is an imperialist superpower.

Myers says that the DPRK’s governing ideology has been misunderstood by the United States. We think of it as “authoritarian communist,” thanks to its all-powerful state and various Stalinist trappings. But Myers says this is misleading: The regime is closer in character to fascism, because of its racism and nationalism (Stalinists have many unappealing qualities, but they do not build their ideology around race and nation). The communist elements, Myers says, are window dressing. Even Kim Il-Sung himself knew little about Marxism, and he dismayed the Russians when they quizzed him on it. And strictly speaking, the regime operates as a monarchy. Myers says that “socialism” is not the right term, because it doesn’t describe the self-image we see in the state’s propaganda, which heavily emphasizes the purity of North Koreans and their need for a protective parent-leader. Demick acknowledges that Kim Il-Sung “rejected traditional Communist teachings about universalism” and “was a Korean nationalist in the extreme” who treated Koreans almost as a “chosen people.”

For example, personally, I find Myers’ explanation appealing. If I’m being honest, though, that’s probably partly because it lumps Kim Jong Un in with right-wing fascists, and distances him from the left. I’ve always felt that “socialists” have no more responsibility for dictatorships that call themselves socialist than democratic republicans have for, well, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. Since I oppose dictatorships universally, pointing out that there have been “leftist” dictatorships poses no actual challenge to my politics. Instinctively, though, I confess that I’d feel relieved if Kim Jong Un was lumped in with the right rather than the left.

He is quoting Brian Reynolds Meyers and agreeing with him on the DPRK, even after admitting to knowing basically nothing about the country earlier in the article. Thousands of social imperialist nerds are reading this and nodding along, cementing their ridiculous chauvinist worldviews and failing their revolutionary duties.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Reynolds_Myers

Brian Reynolds Myers (born 1963), usually cited as B. R. Myers, is an American professor of international studies at Dongseo University in Busan, South Korea, best known for his writings on North Korean propaganda. He is a contributing editor for The Atlantic and an opinion columnist for The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. Myers is the author of Han Sǒrya and North Korean Literature (Cornell, 1994), A Reader's Manifesto (Melville House, 2002), The Cleanest Race (Melville House, 2010), and North Korea's Juche Myth (Sthele Press, 2015).

Myers was born in New Jersey, near Fort Dix. His mother is British, and his father was a U.S. Army officer from Pennsylvania who served in South Korea as a military chaplain, often helping out local orphans.

Myers spent his childhood in Bermuda and his high school youth in apartheid-era South Africa, and received graduate education in West Berlin during the early 1980s, occasionally visiting East Germany. He earned an MA degree in Soviet studies at Ruhr University (1989) and a PhD degree in Korean studies with a focus on North Korean literature at the University of Tübingen (1992). Myers subsequently taught German in Japan and worked for a Mercedes-Benz liaison office in Beijing during the mid-1990s.

This guy is a Liberal. Stop trying to make NJR cool, he's never going to be cool

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I'm not particularly familiar with it, I just know I've encountered a lot of smug soc dem defenders on here lately and it perplexes me because like 80% of people seem mostly cool until some thread about a social chauvinist and suddenly everyone comes out of the woodwork to give the most milquetoast social democrat opportunist mealy mouthed nonsense. Like seeing Vaushite weeds springing up in your well kept yard

[–] voight@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

There have been literal Vaush people lurking around since the original post-reddit ban Discord and honestly I peaced out for a while since I wondered if they got a mole in here (or something, a secret third thing, look, there was a lot of talk about wreckers so I mentally connected it with Haz and Vaush who I had seen scouting y'all literally, they do that shit, they are huge dweebs) messing shit up. I would just rather deal with needing an actual mass report from Nazis than getting banned over the perception something I said was too harsh on Robert Evans because he's an anarchist.

[–] voight@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Before you doubt it, tell me why there is a video of Haz reporting an even SMALLER left unity website to the literal FBI and telling his followers to do the same, but it's impossible for this place to lose safety by obscurity it never had to begin with.

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Haz was on chapo.chat in the first year, he got drummed out for being a shit-brain liberal

[–] voight@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago

One of their mods showed up in TrueAnon etcetera, they are down bad. They literally don't do anything else. Their ideology is based around building his engagement. Nihilistic clowns.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

Attachment to individual politicians and their personalities instead of the politics they represent is the twelfth type of Liberalism