Basically I'm saying that the people in here saying that deep theoretical discussions between tendencies are allowed are kind of full of it and not paying attention, the opposite is true. All that is allowed if very shallow joking conversations. The more deep and truthful your critique, the harder it is to wriggle out of, the more likely you are to get banned for it because the litmus test for banning is based on outrage from the offended party and not any objective metric, and truthful critiques cause more outrage and offense.

Damn you really summed up my feelings on it

[–] voight@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They better ban me too if they take Zed bc I need to get back to the point where we're arguing constructively again

[–] Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

I'm curious why their comment got deleted. They weren't really doing a sectarianism, just pointing out how the sectarianism rule ends up working around here. What he said was totally accurate.